Judgment L.D. and P.K. v. Bulgaria - paternity suits of two men claiming to be biological fathers

CtEDO 2021-10-07 0,89

report provided by the government, indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgment, including the information provided on the adopted legislative amendments to the Family Code which provide for the possibility for any person

CtEDO 2016-12-07 0,88

The applicable law at the time was the 1985 Family Code (“the 1985 Code”). According to Article 32 (1) of the 1985 Code, the husband of a child’s mother was considered to be the father of any child born during the marriage or before the exp

CtEDO 2016-12-08 0,87

Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Respondent State to take m

CtEDO 2016-12-08 0,87

Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Respondent State to take m

CtEDO 2014-01-10 0,87

‐ I; Jevremović v. Serbia, no. 3150/05, §§ 97-112, 17 July 2007, and Jäggi v. Switzerland, no. 58757/00, §§ 28-44, ECHR 2006 ‐ X)? 2. Has the length of the paternity disputes been excessive within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convent