CtEDO 19.12.2024 RO

Judgment Grande Oriente d’Italia v. Italy - parliamentary inquiry into Mafia infiltration of Masonic lodges, search and seizure in breach of the Convention

HOTĂRÂRE

19.12.2024

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Judgment Grande Oriente d’Italia v. Italy - parliamentary inquiry into Mafia infiltration of Masonic lodges, search and seizure in breach of the Convention (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2023-06-13

0,91

GRANDE ORIENTE D'ITALIA v. ITALY

Published on 3 July 2023 FIRST SECTION Application no. 29550/17 GRANDE ORIENTE D’ITALIA against Italy lodged on 13 April 2017 communicated on 13 June 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant – a freemasonry association – complains, und

CtEDO 2010-12-02

0,89

CASES OF GRANDE ORIENTE D'ITALIA DI PALAZZO GIUSTINIANI AND GRANDE ORIENTE D'ITALIA DI PALAZZO GIUSTINIANI (NO 2) AGAINST ITALY

Resolution CM/ResDH(2010)173 [1] Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Grande Oriente d’Italia di Palazzo Giustiniani and Grande Oriente d’Italia di Palazzo Giustiniani No. 2 against Italy (Application No. 35972/9

CtEDO 2004-12-08

0,88

CASE OF GRANDE ORIENTE D'ITALIA DI PALAZZO GIUSTINIANI AGAINST ITALY

Interim Resolution ResDH(2004)71 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 2 August 2001, final on 12 December 2001, in the case of Grande Oriente d'Italia di Palazzo Giustiniani against Ital y (Adopted by the Committ

CtEDO 2023-05-22

0,88

BAJČETIĆ v. MONTENEGRO

v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000 ‐ IV), was the investigation in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article 3 of the Convention (see Cestaro v. Italy, no. 6884/11, §§ 216-217, 7 April 2015, and Baranin an

CtEDO 2008-06-25

0,87

CASE OF MAESTRI AGAINST ITALY

1993, which sets out clearly the incompatibility of the exercise of the functions of judge with the membership of the freemasons (see §§ 22 and 41 of the Court's judgement). III. Conclusions of the respondent state The government considers

Sursă