Judgment Uspaskich v. Lithuania – no violation of well-known politician’s electoral rights

CtEDO 2016-12-20 0,88

us persecutionis. The offences of which the applicant was accused had nothing to do with his work as a Member of the European Parliament. Lastly, the European Parliament noted that the decision on the waiver of immunity in no way constitute

CtEDO 2015-02-02 0,88

before the Court of Appeal, arguing that there had been a violation of his defence rights and his right to a public hearing. By a letter of 23 June 2010 the judge of the Vilnius Regional Court explained to the applicant in writing that unde

CtEDO 2022-09-22 0,87

ed in order to give effect to the judgment, and noting that no award of just satisfaction was made by the Court in the present case (see document DH-DD(2022)688 ); Taking note of the various efforts undertaken by the authorities, in particu

CtEDO 2022-11-03 0,86

No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Public hearing;Exclusion of publi

CtEDO 2022-03-15 0,86

No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);Violation of Article 6+6-3 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Cr