Legal summary - Decision on a request for an advisory opinion under Protocol No. 16 concerning the interpretation and application of Article 8 of the Convention

RESPONDENT

ROU

HOTĂRÂRE

20.12.2024

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Legal summary - Decision on a request for an advisory opinion under Protocol No. 16 concerning the interpretation and application of Article 8 of the Convention (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2022-03-09

0,87

CASE OF N. AGAINST ROMANIA

terms of Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the final judgments of the Court in any case to which they are a party, fully, effectively and promptly; EXHORTED the authorities, at the appropriate level, to take, as a matte

CtEDO 2020-09-21

0,87

PETRESCU c. ROUMANIE

hearing in the determination of his civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? 2. Has there been an interference with the applicant’s rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1? 3. If so, was that interf

CtEDO 2016-10-18

0,87

CASE OF TRUFIN AND 5 OTHER CASES AGAINST ROMANIA

indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments, including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court, where appropriate (see document DH-DD(2016)794 ); Having satis

CtEDO 2025-12-10

0,87

CASE OF LUNGU AND OTHERS AGAINST ROMANIA AND 1 OTHER CASE

order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court in respect of application no. 68851/16 (see documents DH-DD(2025)715 and DH-DD(2025)716 ); Having s

CtEDO 2016-02-05

0,87

ELISEI-UZUN AND ANDONIE v. ROMANIA

. 821 of 3 July 2008. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1. Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular: – did they have access to

Sursă