Decision on a request for an advisory opinion under Protocol No. 16 concerning the interpretation and application of Article 8 of the Convention

RESPONDENT

ROU

HOTĂRÂRE

20.12.2024

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Decision on a request for an advisory opinion under Protocol No. 16 concerning the interpretation and application of Article 8 of the Convention (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2022-03-09

0,88

CASE OF N. AGAINST ROMANIA

terms of Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the final judgments of the Court in any case to which they are a party, fully, effectively and promptly; EXHORTED the authorities, at the appropriate level, to take, as a matte

CtEDO 2021-03-09

0,88

MARIN v. ROMANIA

well as on Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the Convention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination on account of her sex, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8 and/or Article 1

CtEDO 2024-11-12

0,88

RUSU v. ROMANIA

1 to the Convention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the re-assessment of the applicant’s pension rights and the demand for the retrospective repayment of an important sum of money amount to a deprivation of his possessions within the meaning o

CtEDO 2020-09-21

0,88

PETRESCU c. ROUMANIE

hearing in the determination of his civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? 2. Has there been an interference with the applicant’s rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1? 3. If so, was that interf

CtEDO 2022-02-04

0,87

GHIȚĂ v. ROMANIA

, §§ 128-131, ECHR 2015)? 2. If so, was that interference justified under Article 8 § 2 of the Convention? In particular, did the domestic judicial authorities adequately put in balance, in the light of the criteria established in the Court

Sursă