Judgment Kebe and Others v. Ukraine - border guards unlawfully prevented a claim for asylum

CtEDO 2017-01-12 0,89

at the State Border Control Service. However, sometime later the border guards stated that they could not accept the asylum applications from the applicants, as the applicants were on board a vessel flying the flag of a foreign State. Such

CtEDO 2013-01-21 0,87

THE PARTIES 1. Were the applicants within the jurisdiction of Ukraine from 24 February 2012 onwards, while they were on board the vessel that had taken them to Ukraine? 2. Did the Ukrainian authorities refuse to allow the applicants to dise

CtEDO 2025-01-23 0,86

Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Prohibition of

CtEDO 2025-10-09 0,86

Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Prohibition of

CtEDO 2025-10-15 0,86

the adoption of the necessary general measures concerning poor material conditions of detention and the lack of effective remedies thereof in the Nevmerzhitsky group of cases; unlawful arrest, excessive length of pre-trial detention, the la