Judgment Ivanova and Ivashova v. Russia - appeals declared inadmissible as out of time

CtEDO 2021-12-07 0,90

foregoing, the applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention must be rejected for the failure to comply with the six ‐ month time-limit within the meaning of Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the

CtEDO 2021-06-08 0,90

The Court having regard to the above finding under Article 2 of the Convention considers that this complaint, too, is manifestly ill-founded, and thus must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For thes

CtEDO 2019-09-17 0,90

regard to all the material in its possession and the above conclusions, the Court finds that the complaint related to the applicant’s trial in absentia is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) an

CtEDO 2017-10-31 0,89

in the Court’s opinion, it cannot be said that the essence of the applicant’s right of access to a court was impaired or that the proportionality principle was not respected in the present case. 28. It follows that the complaint under Artic

CtEDO 2021-10-19 0,89

. 19. Regard being had to the above, the Court accepts the Government’s objection and finds that this complaint must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares