CtEDO 16.01.2025 Auto

A.C. v. France

RESPONDENT
FRA
HOTĂRÂRE
16.01.2025
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 13+8-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
A.C. v. France (CtEDO, 2025)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifest nefondat; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8 - Obligații pozitive;art. 8-1 - Respectul vieții private);Nici o încălcare a articolului 13+8-1 - Dreptul la o soluție eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și a vieții familiale; Obligații posibile;art. 8-1 - Respectul pentru viața privată); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2025-01-16
1,00
CASE OF A.C. v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1
CtEDO 2025-09-04
0,97
CASE OF E.A. AND ASSOCIATION EUROPÉENNE CONTRE LES VIOLENCES FAITES AUX FEMMES AU TRAVAIL v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 8 - R
CtEDO 2026-01-15
0,97
CASE OF R.M. v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of tort
CtEDO 2018-02-01
0,96
M.A. v. France
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Substantive aspect) (Algeria);Violat
CtEDO 2017-04-06
0,96
CASE OF A.P., GARÇON AND NICOT v. FRANCE - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to res
Sursă