CtEDO 18.04.2024 Auto

Leroy and Others v. France

RESPONDENT
FRA
HOTĂRÂRE
18.04.2024
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Prohibition of torture);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Leroy and Others v. France (CtEDO, 2024)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs; (art. 35-3-a) Manifest nefondat;Nici o încălcare a articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant;Tratament inhuman) (aspect substantiv);Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (aspect substantiv);Nici o încălcare a articolului 13+3 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 3 - Tratament degradant; Prohibirea torturii); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2024-04-18
0,99
CASE OF LEROY AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment)
CtEDO 2024-04-18
0,98
CASE OF LEROY AND OTHERS v. FRANCE - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment)
CtEDO 2026-01-15
0,97
CASE OF R.M. v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of tort
CtEDO 2018-02-01
0,96
M.A. v. France
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Substantive aspect) (Algeria);Violat
CtEDO 2018-02-01
0,96
CASE OF M.A. v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Substantive aspect) (Algeria);Violat
Sursă