ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 16.03.2017 RO

Judgment Olafsson v. Iceland - editor’s liability for defamation violated his right to freedom of expression

HOTĂRÂRE
16.03.2017
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Olafsson v. Iceland - editor’s liability for defamation violated his right to freedom of expression (CtEDO, 2017)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-03-16
0,90
CASE OF ÓLAFSSON v. ICELAND
harm anyone by being defamatory. The Supreme Court referred in this respect to a Supreme Court judgment of 24 November 2011. Therefore, the Supreme Court rejected the applicant’s claim about the case being wrongly directed against him. 22.
CtEDO 2015-11-20
0,90
ÓLAFSSON v. ICELAND
to Icelandic jurisdiction on other grounds. c. In instances other than those covered by items a and b above, the content manager in question and/or the person liable for the media service provider shall be liable for the content published.
CtEDO 2020-11-24
0,89
ÓMARSSON v. ICELAND
and protect freedom of expression. It shall respect human rights and equality, as well as the right to private life, unless the democratic role of a media service and the public’s right to information demand otherwise. A media service shall
CtEDO 2015-11-20
0,88
ARNARSON v. ICELAND
) reads as follows: Article 73 “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and belief. Everyone shall be free to express his thoughts, but shall also be liable to answer for them in court. The law may never provide for censorship or other
CtEDO 2016-05-26
0,88
MAGYAR JETI ZRT v. HUNGARY
is equivalent to disseminating this content, the domestic courts unduly restricted its freedom of expression and the freedom of press. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, in
Sursă