Judgment Škorjanec v. Croatia - failure to properly investigate alleged anti-Roma hate crime

CtEDO 2017-03-28 0,90

paragraphs 10-22 above). The relevant part of the decision reads: “In view of the above, it is established without any doubt that on the day in issue there was a physical conflict between S.K. and I.M. and Š.Š. whereby [S.K. and I.M.] cause

CtEDO 2018-06-26 0,89

the case under Articles 3 and 14 of the Convention and found that the procedural steps taken by the police and the State Attorney’s Office fell short of the requirements of the domestic authorities’ procedural obligation. 33. On the basis o

CtEDO 2014-06-30 0,89

State Attorney’s Office against two individuals in connection with a suspicion that they had committed the offence of attempted causing grave bodily injuries against the applicant and her partner, which had been, in the circumstances of the

CtEDO 2018-07-12 0,88

Communicated on 12 July 2018 FIRST SECTION Application no. 63344/17 Viktor ZAHTILA and Goran KOLETIĆ against Croatia lodged on 22 August 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns the applicants’ complaints about the lack of an appro

CtEDO 2021-09-21 0,88

a punishment ( jus puniendi ), nor can it conclude that the applicant suffered any disproportionate prejudice resulting from the duplication of proceedings, which formed a coherent and proportionate whole (see, Bajčić, cited above, § 46). 3