No interim measures issued against annulment of Romanian presidential election

CtEDO 2025-02-11 0,87

ASSESSMENT 20. The applicant complained that the decision no. 32 of 6 December 2024 of the Constitutional Court annulling the entire electoral process for the election of the President of Romania had been based on unsubstantiated accusation

CtEDO 2025-11-07 0,87

to give effect to the judgment, and noting that no award of just satisfaction was made by the Court in the present case (see document DH-DD(2025)239 ); Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have

CtEDO 2025-12-02 0,87

these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.

CtEDO 2025-06-17 0,86

that the requirements of that Article are absorbed by the more stringent requirements of Article 6 of the Convention ( see Grzęda v. Poland [GC], no. 43572/18, § 352, 15 March 2022). 20. Consequently, the Court considers that, in the light

CtEDO 2022-02-22 0,86

matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms ensh