ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 23.01.2025 RO

Judgment H.W. v. France - divorce for failure to fulfil marital duties: violation of right to respect for private life

HOTĂRÂRE
23.01.2025
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment H.W. v. France - divorce for failure to fulfil marital duties: violation of right to respect for private life (CtEDO, 2025)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-04-06
0,89
CASE OF A.P., GARÇON AND NICOT v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
CtEDO 2017-04-06
0,89
A.P., Garçon and Nicot v. France
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
CtEDO 2025-01-16
0,89
A.C. v. France
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1
CtEDO 2025-01-16
0,89
CASE OF A.C. v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1
CtEDO 2018-02-08
0,88
CASE OF BEN FAIZA v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for privat
Sursă