Judgment Bilinski v. Poland - Transfer of judge between divisions of same court against his will

CtEDO 2021-04-30 0,89

s on the portal sedziowie.net; e) the NCJ was not an independent and impartial authority. 44. The applicant also complains under Article 6 § 1 that the arbitrary and sudden decision on his transfer, taken without his consent and disregardin

CtEDO 2023-01-16 0,88

to another court, or between two divisions of the same court, may violate the principles of irremovability and independence of judges. It also noted that the impugned decision was issued not by a body within the structure of the judiciary,

CtEDO 2022-12-06 0,88

the Chamber to which the cases had been allocated) decided, in the interests of the parties and the proper conduct of the proceedings before it, to indicate to the Government of Poland, under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, that the responde

CtEDO 2021-03-09 0,88

been unlawful and the second judgment validated the applicant’s transfer back to his original court, the applicant was not reinstated in his office of president. The applicant further complains about the unreasonable length of the proceedin

CtEDO 2022-07-21 0,88

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13+6 - Right to a