Judgment Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Ltd v. Ireland - procedural violation of freedom of expression

CtEDO 2019-12-05 0,89

312 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Limited against Ireland (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 5 December 2019 at the 1362 nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Applic

CtEDO 2017-06-15 0,88

s judgment in Independent News and Media and Independent Newspapers Ireland Limited v. Ireland (no. 55120/00, ECHR 2005V (extracts)), she observed that it did not alter or reconfigure Irish law in respect of awards of damages in defamation.

CtEDO 2025-08-26 0,88

unnecessary interference with the exercise of its freedom of expression in violation of Article 10 § 2 of the Convention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant company’s right to freedom of expression, contrary

CtEDO 2016-02-11 0,88

ed. The Supreme Court rejected the applicant’s argument that larger libel awards should be subjected to a more searching scrutiny than had been customary in the past by the appellate courts. Nor did it accept the argument that the relevant

CtEDO 2018-09-27 0,87

/02 and 36448/02, § 45, ECHR 2007 IV; Cumpǎnǎ and Mazǎre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, §§ 88-91, ECHR 2004 XI; and Redaktsiya Gazety ‘Zemlyaki’ v. Russia, no. 16224/05, §§ 34-38, 21 November 2017)? If so, was the interference with the appl