Decision Zaluska v. Poland and Rogalska v. Poland and others - 400 applications struck out

CtEDO 2017-07-11 0,90

uring compliance with the undertakings referred to therein; Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention, in so far as it concerns the complaints under Article 5 §§ 1 an

CtEDO 2007-12-11 0,89

and Witkowska-Toboła v. Poland, cited above, §§ 62-79). Having regard to the circumstances of the present case, the Court finds no reason justifying its departure from the conclusion reached in the above-mentioned cases. Accordingly, the ap

CtEDO 2024-03-07 0,89

, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanim

CtEDO 2024-11-07 0,89

d by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be stru

CtEDO 2024-02-15 0,89

accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously