ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 27.06.2017 RO

Grand Chamber judgment Satakunnan Markkinaporssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland - ban on publishing tax data

HOTĂRÂRE
27.06.2017
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Grand Chamber judgment Satakunnan Markkinaporssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland - ban on publishing tax data (CtEDO, 2017)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2015-07-21
0,90
CASE OF SATAKUNNAN MARKKINAPORSSI OY AND SATAMEDIA OY v. FINLAND
practice the companies were prevented from collecting information for publishing purposes, which meant that there was an interdiction to publish such information. The companies noted that the Finnish Constitution also prohibited indirect pr
CtEDO 2017-06-27
0,90
CASE OF SATAKUNNAN MARKKINAPÖRSSI OY AND SATAMEDIA OY v. FINLAND
order pursuant to section 44(1) of the Personal Data Act. The Supreme Administrative Court requested the Board to prohibit the processing of taxation data by the applicant companies in the manner and to the extent carried out in 2002. 22. I
CtEDO 2017-06-27
0,89
CASE OF SATAKUNNAN MARKKINAPÖRSSI OY AND SATAMEDIA OY v. FINLAND - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
la două, că a existat o încălcare a articolului 6 § 1 din Convenție, în privința duratei procedurilor din fața instanțelor naționale. * În baza secțiunii 5 din Legea privind accesul la și confidențialitatea informațiilor privind impozitele
CtEDO 2013-10-16
0,88
SATAKUNNAN MARKKINAPORSSI OY AND SATAMEDIA OY v. FINLAND
already published in the magazine. Since 2006 the second applicant company has also been publishing Veropörssi magazine. On an unspecified date the Data Protection Ombudsman ( tietosuojavaltuutettu, dataombudsmannen ) contacted the applican
CtEDO 2025-06-12
0,88
PIETILÄINEN AND SANOMA MEDIA FINLAND OY v. FINLAND
l topics or topics that the authorities wish to keep from the public discussion. Without journalists willing to write on important issues, there is nothing of relevant substance for the second applicant to publish. The situation is aggravat
Sursă