CtEDO 03.10.2017 RO

Judgment Novaya Gazeta and Milashina v. Russia - defamation proceedings following media reports on Kursk investigation

HOTĂRÂRE
03.10.2017
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Judgment Novaya Gazeta and Milashina v. Russia - defamation proceedings following media reports on Kursk investigation (CtEDO, 2017)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2013-07-08
0,90
NOVAYA GAZETA AND MILASHINA v. RUSSIA
under Article 152 of the Civil Code since they are an expression of the defendant’s subjective opinion and views and cannot be checked for veracity (paragraph 9). COMPLAINT The applicants complain under Article 10 of the Convention that the
CtEDO 2021-12-01
0,90
MILASHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications
Published on 20 December 2021 THIRD SECTION Application no. 75000/17 Yelena Valeryevna MILASHINA and Others against Russia and 2 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 1 December 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applicat
CtEDO 2017-10-03
0,90
CASE OF NOVAYA GAZETA AND MILASHINA v. RUSSIA
Military Circuit prosecutor had tried to persuade R.K. that his counsel had lodged the application exclusively for the purposes of self-promotion. B.K. had reportedly stated that his client had been willing to cooperate with the prosecutors
CtEDO 2023-01-10
0,90
CASE OF NOVAYA GAZETA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
931/13, § 160, 27 June 2017). The relevant general principles of the Court’s case-law have been summarised in Bédat v. Switzerland ([GC], no. 56925/08, §§ 48-54, 29 March 2016). 17. When examining the defamation claims against the applicant
CtEDO 2021-09-28
0,89
CASE OF NOVAYA GAZETA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
THIRD SECTION CASE OF NOVAYA GAZETA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 12996/12 and 35043/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 28 September 2021 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Novaya Gazeta and Ot
Sursă