ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 05.10.2017 RO

Decision Zamoyski-Brisson v. Poland - complaint concerning compensation claim for nationalised forest inadmissible

HOTĂRÂRE
05.10.2017
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Decision Zamoyski-Brisson v. Poland - complaint concerning compensation claim for nationalised forest inadmissible (CtEDO, 2017)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-01-16
0,91
ZAMOYSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND
ssessed persons or to determine the arrangements whereby they agree to indemnify or compensate the persons concerned (see Von Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos. 71916/01 and 2 others, § 77 in fine, ECHR 2005 ‐ V). 27. The Court
CtEDO 2019-02-12
0,90
PIOTROWSKI v. POLAND
It was subsequently confirmed in the Supreme Court’s resolution of 20 December 2012 and another judgment of that court of 26 June 2015 (ibid., § 74). 29. The Court has also examined the applicant’s submissions regarding his claim for compen
CtEDO 2017-03-07
0,88
BROŃSKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND
/99, §§ 57-71, ECHR 2004-I). 46. It follows that this complaint is incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4. For thes
CtEDO 2017-05-23
0,88
KARCZYŃSKI v. POLAND
by the Court of Appeal, when assessing the statutory requirement of unlawfulness for its refusal of compensation, can be said to have undermined the applicant’s acquittal or to have treated him in a manner inconsistent with his innocence. 2
CtEDO 2017-07-11
0,88
ŻELAWSKI v. POLAND
uring compliance with the undertakings referred to therein; Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention, in so far as it concerns the complaints under Article 5 §§ 1 an
Sursă