Judgment Adyan and Others v. Armenia - shortcomings in alternative to military service

CtEDO 2017-10-12 0,90

orders] are based on the Armenian Constitution and must therefore be applied in the present case with the following considerations. [Citation of sections 2 and 3(1) of the Act (see paragraph 28 below)] It follows from the above-mentioned pr

CtEDO 2016-02-29 0,89

the Armenian Armed Forces For the purpose of supervising the work discipline of persons called up to alternative labour service, the Military Commissary of Armenia and the Head of the Military Police Department of the Ministry of Defence we

CtEDO 2018-10-17 0,88

Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)374 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Adyan and Others against Armenia (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 October 2018 at the 1327 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Appli

CtEDO 2019-12-05 0,88

nts are all Jehovah’s Witnesses who were convicted on various dates in 2012 after refusing to perform both military and alternative civilian service, alleging that the latter was not of genuinely civilian nature and that it contradicted the

CtEDO 2024-06-13 0,88

similar violations of the Convention; ENCOURAGED them to draw inspiration from the experience of other member States which have put in place or are putting in place systems and procedures to comply with judgments finding violations of Artic