Judgment Eker v. Turkey - requirement for a newspaper publisher to print a reply correcting an article

CtEDO 2017-04-19 0,87

provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgment including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2017)167 ); Having

CtEDO 2013-08-30 0,87

remedy to challenge the assize court’s decision. The applicant further complains under Article 10 that the ban on the distribution of the newspaper violated her right to freedom of expression. The applicant finally complains under Article 1

CtEDO 2019-01-09 0,87

account of the failure to communicate to the applicants the prosecutor’s opinion before the Court of Cassation (see Final Resolution in the Göç group CM/ResDH(2011)307 ); Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46,

CtEDO 2018-12-04 0,86

respondent Government’s declaration under Article 6 of the Convention and of the modalities for ensuring compliance with the undertakings referred to therein; Decides to strike that part of the application out of its list of cases in accord

CtEDO 2024-01-17 0,86

the Convention (see Mehmet Çiftci, §§ 35 et seq., and Osman and Altay, §§ 43 et seq., both cited above)? The Government are invited to provide information as to the reason why the newspapers in question were not allowed to publish official