Judgment N. v. Romania - detention of a person su… · CtEDO 2017

CtEDO 2023-03-20

0,90

A.S. v. ROMANIA

Was the applicant’s detention in the psychiatric ward duly justified for the purpose of Article 5 § 1 (e) of the Convention (see N. v. Romania, §§ 151 and 163, and Stanev, § 157, both cited above)? In particular, at the moment of his compul

CtEDO 2017-11-28

0,89

CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or

CtEDO 2017-11-28

0,89

CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1

CtEDO 2017-11-28

0,89

CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or

CtEDO 2017-11-28

0,89

N. v. Romania

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or

Judgment N. v. Romania - detention of a person suffering from psychiatric disorders with no legal basis since 2007

Grupate prin similitudine semantică