Judgment Frisk and Jensen v. Denmark - TV journalists' defamation conviction was justified

CtEDO 2014-06-26 0,89

es the grounds for regarding the allegations as true.” Article 272 “The penalty prescribed in Article 267 of the Penal Code may be remitted if the act has been provoked by improper behaviour on the part of the injured person or if he is gui

CtEDO 2017-12-05 0,88

in patients dying or having their lives shortened. The way that the programme is built up with its beginning and ending, the viewers get the clear impression that the reasons behind this choice of medication [Vinorelbine] were S’s professio

CtEDO 2017-11-22 0,87

to the judgment including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2017)811 ); Having noted that the issues related to the conviction of journalists for defamation cont

CtEDO 2024-06-24 0,87

Published on 15 July 2024 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 16756/24 Mathias Friis MORTENSEN against Denmark lodged on 7 June 2024 communicated on 24 June 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE By a High Court judgment, which became final on 7 Februa

CtEDO 2005-11-17 0,87

be held liable for defamation for accurately publishing statements contained in non-confidential government documents. The Court has constantly held the view that the press “should normally be entitled, when contributing to public debate on