ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 11.01.2018 RO

Judgment Cipoletta v. Italy - creditor claim lasting over 25 years was rights violation

HOTĂRÂRE
11.01.2018
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Cipoletta v. Italy - creditor claim lasting over 25 years was rights violation (CtEDO, 2018)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-12-14
0,89
IMPERATORE AND OTHERS v. ITALY
legrino SPAGNOLETTI 1940 Carmine MINOPOLI 1941 Silvia D’ANIELLO 1932 Household Adriana PEINETTI 1963 Patrizia PEINETTI 1957 Annicchiarico Nicola Casamarciano Naples Court of Appeal, R.G. 2785/18, 28/02/2019 Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of
CtEDO 2024-05-16
0,88
CASE OF PASQUARIELLO v. ITALY
R.G. 2408/2019, 20/02/2020 Naples Court of Appeal, R.G. 810/2020, 04/06/2020 Naples Court of Appeal, R.G. 941/2020, 30/06/2020 Naples Court of Appeal, R.G. 2056/2020, 09/12/2020 25/05/2017 27/02/2018 18/05/2018 18/10/2018 19/02/2020 20/02/2
CtEDO 2023-12-14
0,88
RUSSO AND OTHERS v. ITALY
The applicants claim to still be victims of a violation of Art. 6 for the excessive length of the main proceedings since the Pinto decision acknowledging the violation and awarding compensation has not been enforced by the Government to dat
CtEDO 2025-03-27
0,88
CASE OF NIORT v. ITALY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degradi
CtEDO 2025-03-27
0,87
CASE OF NIORT v. ITALY - [Italian Translation] by the Italian Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degradi
Sursă