Decision Szpiner v. France - lawyer's complaint over disciplinary penalty inadmissible

CtEDO 2025-09-04 0,88

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 8 - R

CtEDO 2018-02-01 0,88

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Substantive aspect) (Algeria);Violat

CtEDO 2018-02-01 0,88

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Substantive aspect) (Algeria);Violat

CtEDO 2021-09-28 0,88

nt did not put forward such a complaint in his constitutional complaint (see paragraph 13 above). 46. Accordingly, this complaint must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. For th

CtEDO 2024-04-18 0,88

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment)