Judgment Kristiana Ltd. v. Lithuania - demolition plan without compensation

CtEDO 2016-06-24 0,90

an order to expropriate and demolish its property but no specific action has been taken. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1. Did the applicant company have a fair hearing in the determination of its civil rights and obligations, in accordance with

CtEDO 2018-02-06 0,88

repair work was in accordance with the relevant domestic law. The applicant company also asked the court to refer the question of whether the Management Plan was in accordance with the Constitution to the Constitutional Court. The court ack

CtEDO 2018-03-28 0,87

Communicated on 28 March 2018 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 59413/17 Kristina RUŠIENĖ against Lithuania lodged on 10 August 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE In 2005 the applicant initiated a lawsuit against a hospital for her mother’s death

CtEDO 2017-10-05 0,87

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 6 - Right t

CtEDO 2017-10-05 0,86

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 6 - Right t