Judgment Guja v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 2) - fresh violation of whistle-blower's rights

CtEDO 2016-05-31 0,89

Moldova ([GC], no. 14277/04, ECHR 2008) is currently pending before the Committee of Ministers, and taking into account the measures taken so far by the respondent Government to abide by the Court’s judgment, is the Court competent to exami

CtEDO 2020-03-05 0,89

(2020)34 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Two cases against Republic of Moldova (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 5 March 2020 at the 1369 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Application No. Case J

CtEDO 2024-04-09 0,89

OURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 16. The general principles concerning whistle-blowers and freedom of expression in the workplace have been set out in Guja v. Moldova [GC], no. 14277/04, §§ 73-78, ECHR 200

CtEDO 2022-01-18 0,89

Published on 7 February 2022 SECOND SECTION Application no. 55374/16 GHIOFRIG S.R.L. against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 15 September 2016 communicated on 18 January 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns alleged unf

CtEDO 2022-05-02 0,89

proceedings in the present case? If so, did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of his civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? 2. Has there been an interference with the applicant