ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 06.03.2025 RO

Decision Kotnik and Jukic v. Slovenia - complaints concerning financial-emergency measures rejected as inadmissible

HOTĂRÂRE
06.03.2025
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Decision Kotnik and Jukic v. Slovenia - complaints concerning financial-emergency measures rejected as inadmissible (CtEDO, 2025)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2015-01-06
0,90
KEKIĆ v. SLOVENIA
of the Convention and that that finding is valid also in the context of the complaint under Article 13 of the Convention. It follows that this complaint is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) a
CtEDO 2023-11-07
0,90
LUKIĆ AND KOVINAR D.O.O. v. SLOVENIA
(see paragraph 5 above). The Court considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set o
CtEDO 2021-09-28
0,89
PINTARIĆ v. CROATIA
nt did not put forward such a complaint in his constitutional complaint (see paragraph 13 above). 46. Accordingly, this complaint must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. For th
CtEDO 2021-09-21
0,89
IGNJATIĆ v. CROATIA
a punishment ( jus puniendi ), nor can it conclude that the applicant suffered any disproportionate prejudice resulting from the duplication of proceedings, which formed a coherent and proportionate whole (see, Bajčić, cited above, § 46). 3
CtEDO 2018-06-12
0,89
STOJAKOVIĆ v. CROATIA
decisions in the applicant’s case are arbitrary or manifestly unreasonable (compare Lukežić, cited above, § 56). 42. Against the above background, the Court finds that the applicant’s complaint is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected
Sursă