Judgment Kuznetsov and Others v. Russia - requests for reopening of time allowed for appeal

CtEDO 2020-09-28 0,88

whether it had relevant and sufficient grounds (see Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 108-110, 27 November 2012)? 3. (Application Deniyev v. Russia, 25142/19) Was the length of the judicial review of the applicant’s appeal complaint agai

CtEDO 2014-03-21 0,88

red a time-limit for appealing against decisions of 6 June 2011 and 17 January 2011 respectively, were the guarantees of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and in particular the principle of legal certainty, respected (see Bezrukovy v. Russia

CtEDO 2022-03-10 0,88

rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the cas

CtEDO 2020-03-02 0,88

-treatment in case of their removal, what measures (such as obtaining assurances from relevant governments) have been taken or could be envisaged by the Russian Government in order to mitigate that risk? APPENDIX List of applications No. Ap

CtEDO 2022-10-06 0,88

THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 50521/20 Sergey Alekseyevich KUZNETSOV against Russia (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 6 October 2022 as a Committee composed of: Darian Pavli, Presid