Decision Evans v. United Kingdom - complaint declared inadmissible

CtEDO 2021-03-23 0,90

§ 81, ECHR 2002 ‐ IV). No violation of Article 5 § 1 is disclosed and the complaint must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadmissible.

CtEDO 2018-05-29 0,89

the Court finds that the applicants’ complaints concerning the inadequacy of the judicial response in the aftermath of the incident are manifestly ill ‐ founded and must be declared inadmissible within the meaning of Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 o

CtEDO 2017-04-25 0,89

longer retained the biometric data that forms the subject of his complaint. 3. Conclusion 45. In light of the above, the application must be rejected as inadmissible in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention. For these reas

CtEDO 2005-05-19 0,89

accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Declares inadmissible the applicant's complaints concerning discrimination in the enjoyment of her right to private life and concerning the la

CtEDO 2003-09-16 0,89

without prejudging the merits, the applicant’s complaints concerning the length of the proceedings; Declares inadmissible, the applicant’s remaining complaints, which were introduced after the initial application. Michael O’Boyle Matti Pell