CtEDO 22.01.2026 RO

Judgment Kaya v. Belgium - Failure to comply with principles of impartiality and presumption of innocence in case concerning social-security fraud

HOTĂRÂRE

22.01.2026

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2026
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Judgment Kaya v. Belgium - Failure to comply with principles of impartiality and presumption of innocence in case concerning social-security fraud (CtEDO, 2026)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2022-12-14

0,90

CASE OF KAYA AGAINST BELGIUM

Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)369 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights Cennet Kaya against Belgium (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 December 2022 at the 1452 nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Applicati

CtEDO 2021-09-14

0,88

CASE OF BRUS v. BELGIUM

Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair

CtEDO 2005-06-02

0,88

CASE OF CLAES AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM

No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms;Tri

CtEDO 2023-09-26

0,88

CASE OF YÜKSEL YALÇINKAYA v. TÜRKİYE

Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege;Nullum crimen sine lege);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;E

CtEDO 2020-05-28

0,88

Farzaliyev v. Azerbaijan

Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a f

Sursă