Judgment Karachentsev v. Russia - held in cage during videolink appeal hearing

CtEDO 2019-03-26 0,90

their personal attendance at court hearings (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev, cited above, §§ 122-39; Urazov v. Russia, no. 42147/05, §§ 82-83, 14 June 2016; and Vorontsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 59655/14 and 2 others, § 31, 31 January 2017)

CtEDO 2022-09-15 0,90

s; Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - placement in a metal cage during court hearings before the Ukhta Town Court since the beginning of the trial until conviction on 25/12/2019; Art. 13 - lack of

CtEDO 2025-11-07 0,90

confinement in a metal cage during the criminal hearings, was examined in the framework of the Lutsenko v. Ukraine (No. 2) group of cases closed by Final Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)139 ; Having satisfied itself that all the measures required

CtEDO 2014-11-26 0,90

d him to nine and a half years’ imprisonment. The court also found Kh. guilty and sentenced him to four years’ imprisonment. The court relied, inter alia, on forensic evidence, numerous witnesses’ statements, including testimonies given by

CtEDO 2023-03-10 0,89

-8 Komi Republic 24/10/2019 - 23/06/2021 opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - from 14/04/2021 to 09/07/2021, Murmansk Regi