Judgment Jureša v. Croatia - Supreme Court change of case-law was no violation

CtEDO 2017-04-04 0,88

Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to

CtEDO 2017-04-04 0,88

Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to

CtEDO 2019-05-14 0,88

domestic law and practice 14. The relevant domestic law and practice is set out in the case of Jureša v. Croatia (no. 24079/11, §§ 18-20, 22 May 2018). COMPLAINTS 15. The applicant complained, under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1

CtEDO 2020-05-26 0,87

No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) (Azerbaijan);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect) (Azerbaijan);No violation of Article 2 - Right to

CtEDO 2023-10-17 0,87

Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obli