Decision Roj TV A/S v. Denmark - applicant company may not benefit from Art. 10 by virtue of Art. 17

CtEDO 2015-10-13 0,86

missed the applicants’ appeal on points of law as ill-founded. It held that following the amendment of the relevant domestic civil procedure rules the applicants’ arguments no longer fell within the lawfully allowed reasons for an appeal on

CtEDO 2018-11-29 0,86

applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the application (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human ri

CtEDO 2019-03-20 0,86

v. Hungary, no. 38832/06, 20 May 2010, the Supreme Court did not find any basis for concluding that the provision in Section 29 of the Constitution was in contravention of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention or of Article 14 read

CtEDO 2011-01-06 0,86

special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a)

CtEDO 2016-11-22 0,86

, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds n