CtEDO 18.03.2025 Auto

CASE OF BRD – GROUPE SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE S.A. v. ROMANIA

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
18.03.2025
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for home);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for home);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BRD – GROUPE SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE S.A. v. ROMANIA (CtEDO, 2025)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecția preliminară aderată la fonduri și respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs; menţinerea inadmisibilă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs;Nici o încălcare a articolului 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și de familie (art. 8-1 - Respectul corespondenței;Respectul de domiciliu);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și de familie (art. 8-1 - Respectul de corespondență;Respectul de domiciliu); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-11-16
0,96
N. v. Romania (no. 2)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the Court;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic rem
CtEDO 2021-11-16
0,96
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA (No. 2)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the Court;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic rem
CtEDO 2020-02-11
0,95
CASE OF BUTURUGĂ v. ROMANIA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3+8 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (
CtEDO 2020-02-11
0,95
Buturugă v. Romania
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3+8 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (
CtEDO 2021-11-16
0,95
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA (No. 2) - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the
Sursă