Judgement Aleksander Sabev v. Bulgaria - lack of full judicial review of the lawfulness of a dismissal

CtEDO 2020-10-13 0,89

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reaso

CtEDO 2021-09-07 0,88

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1

CtEDO 2017-10-25 0,88

regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2017)1115 ); Having noted that the outstanding questions concerning the existence of a legal review, meeting the requirements of Article 5, paragraph 4,

CtEDO 2020-10-13 0,88

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reaso

CtEDO 2023-10-10 0,88

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);