CtEDO 26.07.2018 RO

Judgment Dridi v. Germany - Summoning by public notification and no adequate opportunity for the lawyer to prepare is in breach of the Convention

HOTĂRÂRE

26.07.2018

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Judgment Dridi v. Germany - Summoning by public notification and no adequate opportunity for the lawyer to prepare is in breach of the Convention (CtEDO, 2018)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2018-07-26

0,89

CASE OF DRIDI v. GERMANY

40 §§ 2 and 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (see paragraph 19 below), had been met. The applicant’s lawyer had waived his right to be summoned, and his application for an adjournment had not relied on the failure to comply with the time

CtEDO 2016-03-14

0,89

DRIDI v. GERMANY

time and facilities to prepare his defence before the hearing in the Hamburg Regional Court, as required by Article 6 § 3 (b) of the Convention? In particular, was counsel given adequate opportunity to access the court’s case-file after the

CtEDO 2022-12-14

0,88

CASE OF DRIDI AGAINST GERMANY

Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)386 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Dridi against Germany (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 December 2022 at the 1452 nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Application No.

CtEDO 2025-07-08

0,87

CASE OF HÖLSCHER v. GERMANY

The general principles concerning the right of an absent defendant to be effectively defended by a lawyer under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention have been summarised, inter alia, in Van Geyseghem v. Belgium ([GC], no. 26103/95, §

CtEDO 2025-01-27

0,87

BRAITARU v. ITALY

Published on 17 February 2025 FIRST SECTION Application no. 40922/19 Maricica BRAITARU against Italy lodged on 24 July 2019 communicated on 27 January 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns criminal proceedings in which th

Sursă