ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 04.09.2018 RO

Judgment Fatih Tas v. Turkey (5) - criminal proceedings against a publisher for denigrating the Republic of Turkey

HOTĂRÂRE
04.09.2018
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Fatih Tas v. Turkey (5) - criminal proceedings against a publisher for denigrating the Republic of Turkey (CtEDO, 2018)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-12-11
0,90
FATIH TAȘ v. TURKEY
pak v. Turkey, no. 29680/05, 15 September 2015; Semir Güzel v. Turkey, no. 29483/09, 13 September 2016; and Döner and Others v. Turkey, no. 29994/02, 7 March 2017), has there been an interference with the applicant’s right to freedom of exp
CtEDO 2017-12-12
0,89
TAȘ v. TURKEY
Communicated on 12 December 2017 SECOND SECTION Application no. 51512/08 Fatih TAŞ against Turkey lodged on 24 September 2008 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the criminal proceedings brought against the applicant under s
CtEDO 2017-12-11
0,89
TAȘ v. TURKEY
Communicated on 11 December 2017 SECOND SECTION Application no. 51508/08 Fatih TAŞ against Turkey lodged on 22 September 2008 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the criminal proceedings brought against the applicant under s
CtEDO 2021-01-19
0,89
CASE OF ATILLA TAȘ v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to libe
CtEDO 2021-01-19
0,89
CASE OF ATILLA TAȘ v. TURKEY
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to libe
Sursă