Judgment Dadayan v. Armenia - key witnesses not heard in enriched uranium smuggling case

CtEDO 2016-11-04 0,88

on the ground that some of his statements were in contradiction with the statements of H.O. and S.T. The trial court rejected this request, considering it ungrounded. On 25 May 2011 the Regional Court convicted the applicant and sentenced h

CtEDO 2012-04-10 0,87

Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Violation of A

CtEDO 2020-09-07 0,87

Communicated on 7 September 2020 Published on 28 September 2020 FIRST SECTION Application no. 24425/15 Marzpetuni AVUSHYAN against Armenia lodged on 11 May 2015 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of c

CtEDO 2022-11-08 0,87

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2

CtEDO 2016-10-27 0,87

Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing;Equality of arms;Impartial tribunal);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of pr