CtEDO 09.10.2018 RO

Judgment Batkivska Turbota Foundation v. Ukraine - State gained ownership of validly purchased property

HOTĂRÂRE
09.10.2018
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Judgment Batkivska Turbota Foundation v. Ukraine - State gained ownership of validly purchased property (CtEDO, 2018)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2020-09-03
0,90
CASE OF BATKIVSKA TURBOTA FOUNDATION v. UKRAINE
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF BATKIVSKA TURBOTA FOUNDATION v. UKRAINE (Application no. 5876/15) JUDGMENT (Just satisfaction) Art 41 • Just satisfaction • Withdrawal of applicant ́s claims for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage further to review of
CtEDO 2021-10-13
0,90
CASE OF BATKIVSKA TURBOTA FOUNDATION AGAINST UKRAINE
Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)252 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Batkivska Turbota Foundation against Ukraine (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 October 2021 at the 1414 th meeting of the Ministers’ De
CtEDO 2025-01-09
0,89
CASE OF FEDERATION OF TRADE UNIONS OF CHERNIHIV REGION v. UKRAINE
to the peaceful enjoyment of its possessions. They submitted, however, that the interference had been lawful, effected in the public interest and proportionate. In particular, they noted, referring to judgments delivered between 2018 and 20
CtEDO 2019-10-15
0,89
SHYNKARENKO v. UKRAINE
those plots. According to her, her neighbour had eventually taken possession of her plot. Lastly, as regards compensation, the applicant suggested that Article 386 of the Civil Code, as relied on by the Government, was general and not appli
CtEDO 2025-06-26
0,89
CASE OF MARKETTRANS, PP v. UKRAINE
need to restore the State’s rights in respect of the disputed property (see paragraph 22 above); the Government did not argue that the State needed that property for any particular and compelling reason. They did not explain how the State’s
Sursă