Judgment Daineliene v. Lithuania - Supreme Court’s impartiality compromised in embezzlement case

CtEDO 2018-10-16 0,89

FOURTH SECTION CASE OF DAINELIENĖ v. LITHUANIA (Application no. 23532/14) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 16 October 2018 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Dainelienė v. Lithuania, The European Court of

CtEDO 2017-09-13 0,88

of the Convention that the Supreme Court panel which decided whether to examine her appeal on points of law was not independent and impartial because its chair was the father of the prosecutor in the same proceedings. QUESTION TO THE PARTIE

CtEDO 2019-06-12 0,88

Resolution CM/ResDH(2019)132 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Dainelienė against Lithuania (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 12 June 2019 at the 1349 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Application

CtEDO 2022-03-25 0,88

s on points of law on 8 January 2020 impartial, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, in view of the participation of Judge D.Š. in that panel (see Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, §§ 73-78, ECHR 2015, and the cases cited ther

CtEDO 2019-07-08 0,88

unacceptable assessment of the facts and domestic law. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Were the selection panels of the Supreme Court which refused to accept the applicant’s appeals on points of law on 17 April and 25 May 2018 independent and impar