Judgment Kursun v. Turkey - Compensation claim unfairly denied after oil explosion

CtEDO 2018-05-29 0,88

the Court finds that the applicants’ complaints concerning the inadequacy of the judicial response in the aftermath of the incident are manifestly ill ‐ founded and must be declared inadmissible within the meaning of Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 o

CtEDO 2016-11-22 0,88

Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3 - Manifestly ill-founded);Remainder inadmissible (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Brought promptly before judge or other officer);Violation of A

CtEDO 2021-06-17 0,88

had not been provided with redress for the damage he had sustained despite its recognition by experts. As regards complaints (i) and (ii), the Court has examined these complaints and considers that, in the light of all the material in its p

CtEDO 2021-03-26 0,88

Published on 12 April 2021 SECOND SECTION Application no. 39854/11 Yavuz AKIN and Others against Turkey lodged on 19 January 2011 communicated on 26 March 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the explosion that took plac

CtEDO 2021-09-16 0,87

CERN that the just satisfaction awarded by the Court has not yet been paid despite its repeated appeals and that prolonged delays in fulfilling this obligation not only deprive the individual victims from receiving compensation for the dama