ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 04.12.2018 RO

Grand Chamber judgment Ilnseher v. Germany - Subsequent preventive detention of convicted murder was justified

HOTĂRÂRE
04.12.2018
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Grand Chamber judgment Ilnseher v. Germany - Subsequent preventive detention of convicted murder was justified (CtEDO, 2018)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2014-12-22
0,89
ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
ordered in relation to an unlawful act committed by the person concerned. Article 63 of the Criminal Code provides that if someone commits an unlawful act without criminal responsibility or with diminished criminal responsibility, the court
CtEDO 2013-01-22
0,88
DÖRR v. GERMANY
e detention. B. Relevant domestic law A comprehensive summary of the provisions of the Criminal Code and of the Code of Criminal Procedure governing the distinction between penalties and measures of correction and prevention, in particular
CtEDO 2011-01-13
0,87
CASE OF SCHUMMER v. GERMANY (No. 1)
Procedure governing the distinction between penalties and measures of correction and prevention, in particular preventive detention, and the making, review and execution in practice of preventive detention orders, is contained in the Court'
CtEDO 2012-03-22
0,87
CASE OF OSTERMUNCHNER v. GERMANY
case of M. v. Germany (cited above; see §§ 137 ss. of the Federal Constitutional Court’s judgment). It stressed, in particular, that the constitutional requirement of establishing a difference between preventive detention and detention for
CtEDO 2012-06-14
0,87
GLIEN v. GERMANY
detention orders, is contained in the Court’s judgment in the case of M. v. Germany (no. 19359/04, §§ 45-78, ECHR 2009). The provisions referred to in the present case provide as follows: 1. The order of preventive detention by the sentenci
Sursă