Judgment Brisc v. Romania - chief prosecutor's dismissal for making statements to the press

CtEDO 2015-10-20 0,89

The applicant could not be held liable for the fact that after presenting his press release, AXA TV channel made express referrals to the judge delegated to the prison. The evidence in the file proved that there was a tensed relationship be

CtEDO 2019-01-30 0,88

“constitutional conflict” between the Romanian President and the Ministry of Justice, because of the President’s refusal to issue the revocation decree. On 30 May 2018 the Constitutional Court adopted Decision no. 358, holding that there wa

CtEDO 2025-06-12 0,88

Resolution CM/ResDH(2025)110 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Brisc against Romania (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 12 June 2025 at the 1531 st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Application No. Cas

CtEDO 2018-10-15 0,87

Communicated on 15 October 2018 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 68373/14 Cristina RUSU against Romania lodged on 2 October 2014 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the sentence imposed on the applicant, who is a teacher, by t

CtEDO 2012-05-21 0,87

in force at the material time, as well as their subsequent amendments are described in Timciuc v. Romania ((dec.), no. 28999/03, 12 October 2010). COMPLAINT The applicant complains under Article 10 of the Convention that the criminal senten