CtEDO 15.04.2025 RO

Judgment Badescu and Others v. Romania - Applicants’ conviction for abuse of office as judges was not precluded by guarantee of judicial independence

HOTĂRÂRE

15.04.2025

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Judgment Badescu and Others v. Romania - Applicants’ conviction for abuse of office as judges was not precluded by guarantee of judicial independence (CtEDO, 2025)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2021-09-16

0,87

BĂDEANU v. ROMANIA

Published on 4 October 2021 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 7490/16 Adrian-Cristinel BĂDEANU against Romania lodged on 15 January 2016 communicated on 16 September 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged lack of

CtEDO 2019-12-17

0,87

BRĂDIȚEANU v. ROMANIA

that the applicant did not put forth any evidence that would suggest that the interpretation given by the domestic courts to the relevant legal provisions concerning impartiality of judges had amounted to an arbitrary or unreasonable applic

CtEDO 2022-05-17

0,87

POPA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

see Bochan v. Ukraine, no. 7577/02, § 71, 3 May 2007). Bearing in mind that in the present case the judges on the appeal bench, on leaving office, were replaced on the basis of the Internal Regulations of Courts, that the applicants’ compla

CtEDO 2023-03-17

0,86

MUSTĂȚEA v. ROMANIA

Published on 3 April 2023 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 19160/18 Radu MUSTĂŢEA against Romania lodged on 19 April 2018 communicated on 17 March 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns the allegation that the court that convicted

CtEDO 2019-10-24

0,86

MIRON v. ROMANIA

Communicated on 24 October 2019 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 37324/16 Adriana-Laura MIRON against Romania lodged on 15 June 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the criminal proceedings opened by the domestic authoriti

Sursă