CtEDO 15.04.2025 RO

Judgment Van Slooten v. the Netherlands - Failure to examine child’s interests when ending parental authority did not protect family life

HOTĂRÂRE

15.04.2025

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Judgment Van Slooten v. the Netherlands - Failure to examine child’s interests when ending parental authority did not protect family life (CtEDO, 2025)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2025-06-11

0,90

VAN DIJK v. THE NETHERLANDS

acceptable term ( aanvaardbare termijn ) for the child to cope with uncertainties regarding his family situation had expired, noting that the child lived for almost five years with the foster family. The decision was upheld by the Court of

CtEDO 2020-08-31

0,89

VAN SLOOTEN v. THE NETHERLANDS

September 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the decision to divest the applicant of her parental authority ( ouderlijke macht ) over her daughter, who had been born in August 2014. That decision was taken by a Regiona

CtEDO 2025-06-12

0,89

KANALOVA v. THE NETHERLANDS

The applicant complains under Article 8 of the Convention that no efforts were made to reunite her with her children after they were placed into care. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Did the decision to terminate the applicant’s parental authority

CtEDO 2025-12-12

0,88

DE HEER v. THE NETHERLANDS

impossible for those conditions to be met. The applicants disagreed, arguing that they were willing to accept help but that certain preconditions imposed by the GI had been unnecessary and that emotional neglect necessitating the care order

CtEDO 2025-06-11

0,88

OBOUCHOVSKAJA v. THE NETHERLANDS

July 2019. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1. Did the decision to terminate the applicant’s parental authority over her son constitute a violation of her right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, amongst o

Sursă