Decision Dzhioyeva v. Georgia and other applications - complaints about events in South Ossetia

CtEDO 2018-11-20 0,90

the Convention. 50. In relation of the first applicant’s complaints raised under Articles 13 and 14 of the Convention, t he Court considers that it cannot, on the basis of the case file, determine the admissibility of these complaints (see

CtEDO 2018-11-20 0,89

Communicated on 20 November 2018 FIRST SECTION Application no. 24964/09 Khadizat Sergeyevna DZHIOYEVA against Georgia lodged on 22 September 2008 The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s decision, whi

CtEDO 2018-11-20 0,89

under Articles 13 and 14 of the Convention are also manifestly ill-founded. D. Conclusion 41. In the light of these circumstances, the Court declares the applications inadmissible pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For

CtEDO 2022-03-03 0,89

2008 Mr Aleksandr BOBROV 361. 34946/09 Kulushev v. Georgia 09/10/2008 Mr Eduard KULUSHEV 362. 34950/09 Tedeyeva v. Georgia 22/09/2008 Ms Aida TEDEYEVA 363. 34952/09 Tekhova v. Georgia 22/09/2008 Ms Evelina TEKHOVA 364. 34957/09 Dzhioyeva v.

CtEDO 2026-01-26 0,88

s v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 109, ECHR 2001-V)? 6. Did the applicants suffer discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights, in breach of Article 14 of the Convention, on grounds of their Georgian ethnic origin