Judgment Kopytok v. Russia - buyer of flat could not terminate seller's family's right to use it

CtEDO 2014-05-15 0,89

inheritance).” COMPLAINT The applicant complains under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about a violation of her right to peaceful enjoyment of her property on account of the fact that the domestic courts granted the permanent right to use the p

CtEDO 2012-03-28 0,88

the abovementioned considerations, the court finds the claims unsubstantiated and dismisses them.” On 20 June 2005 the Supreme Court of the Komi Republic upheld the judgment on appeal, having endorsed the Town Court’s reasoning. COMPLAINTS

CtEDO 2016-10-04 0,88

According to the Government, the applicant has not been evicted and continues to reside in the flat. 21. On an unspecified date the applicant brought an action against the State, alleging that the local authorities’ inaction had resulted in

CtEDO 2017-09-12 0,87

she has at least a “legitimate expectation” of obtaining effective enjoyment of a property right. By contrast, the hope of recognition of a property right which it has been impossible to exercise effectively cannot be considered a “possessi

CtEDO 2018-01-09 0,87

implementation of the agreement. In 2009 the applicant retired but continued living in the flat. The regional prosecutor’s office did not ask him to vacate the flat when he retired. In 2015 the regional authorities contacted the regional pr