Judgment SA-Capital Oy v. Finland - company's complaint about use of evidence in cartel trial

CtEDO 2011-09-26 0,90

FOURTH SECTION Application no. 5556/10 by SA-CAPITAL OY against Finland lodged on 25 January 2010 STATEMENT OF FACTS THE FACTS The applicant, SA-Capital Oy, is a Finnish limited liability company which has its seat in Rovaniemi. It is repre

CtEDO 2007-10-23 0,86

t no. 165/1998) provides that the Court of Appeal is to hold a hearing, regardless of whether one has been requested, if the decision in the matter turns on the credibility of the testimony received in the District Court or on new testimony

CtEDO 2025-08-20 0,86

Mutu and Pechstein v. Switzerland, nos. 40575/10 and 67474/10, §§ 56-59, 2 October 2018; and Xavier Lucas v. France, no. 15567/20, §§ 30-32, 9 June 2022)? If so, did the applicant company have a fair hearing in the determination of its civi

CtEDO 2010-05-18 0,86

for example, Riihikallio and Others v. Finland, no. 25072/02, §§ 22-27, 31 May 2007; F. and M. v. Finland, no. 22508/02, §§ 48-53, 17 July 2007 and Ekholm v. Finland, no. 68050/01, §§ 62-66, 24 July 2007). Against this background, the Court

CtEDO 2015-01-07 0,86

applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that one of the Appeal Court judges was biased as he had already, in 2010, participated in another, related case where the applicant was convicted, and that he was therefore prejudic