Judgment Uzan and Others v. Turkey - attachment measures in relation to bankruptcy of Imarbank

CtEDO 2025-06-12 0,88

(see document DH-DD(2025)415 ); Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the preventive attachment against the applicants’ possessions was lifted and the Compensation Commission awarded compensation to t

CtEDO 2025-09-17 0,88

document DH-DD(2025)778 ); Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the preventive attachment against the applicants’ possessions was lifted and the Compensation Commission awarded compensation to the ap

CtEDO 2022-09-22 0,88

above-mentioned obligation; Having examined the information provided by the government as regards the individual measures (see document DH-DD(2022)704 ) and noted with deep regret, in the light of this information, that no further individua

CtEDO 2019-09-04 0,87

in its Final Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)332 concerning the Demirel group of cases, the Committee closed the examination of other similar cases concerning, inter alia, non-communication of the public prosecutor’s opinion to the applicants or t

CtEDO 2024-10-09 0,87

that the applicants are no longer held in detention on remand; Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in this judgment continues to be examined within the framework of the